-- mz a.k.a. miczac a.k.a. Noiseconformist --
scivolo: a concept utilising screen-less compact hardware controllers for music performance
Over the past years
I found ways to treat electronics in a manner similar to
traditional instruments, which gradually brings me closer to an —as I see it—
authentic performance. My desire to have a portable electronic
instrument eventually resulted in the development of the scivolo.
After a long period of time playing my analogue modular synthesiser,
numerous experiments and attempts to create analogue instruments in a
smaller, feasible package, I started to look for a completely different approach.
My experience as a percussionist and experiments with a Laptop Feedback
Synthesiser I conceived made clear to me, I need a good physical connection to my
future instrument.
one of the first tests playing the scivolo's fm-synthesiser section
My search led me to one of the oldest electronic music
input devices, the ribbon controller. A device that allows me best access to
musical expression and performance. I acquired a Doepfer R2M Ribbon
Controller for performing with my modular synthesiser. Years later,
in autumn 2012 — out of pure curiosity — I began to explore its
MIDI capabilities. My first attempts where the simple application of
two sine wave oscillators. Later I extended the capabilities of
my test setup and eventually configured three sine wave oscillators in a
simple frequency modulation configuration. My exploration required
to access more parameters simultaneously. So I connected the next MIDI
controller in reach to the computer: a Korg nanoKONTROL.
a power-noise demo comprising several flavours of distorted, chopped up, glitching sounds
During my experiments with these MIDI controllers I found a way to
attach a nanoKONTROL2 to the steel rail of my ribbon controller.
I had what I wanted: a single compact controller unit I could handle
with one hand and have on my lap while playing. Further development
led to the `scivolo', a laptop instrument where, during performance,
no table and no access to the computer is necessary.
The scivolo basically comprises two main parts:
the controller unit acting as musical input device
giving me access to the sound generators and providing visual feedback;
and the computer-workhorse running the sound synthesis engines and required
management tasks. The controller unit rests on my lap while I sit.
The laptop's screen does not need to be within eyeshot.
Off-the-shelf hardware was combined utilising various types of interfaces.
These components would require far more cabling and connections than I am prepared to handle.
Currently, the configuration is too cluttered and setting it up takes too long.
I consider the scivolo in its current state a proof of
concept, thus, for the time being, I am quite satisfied with it.
Improvements are in the planning and will simplify the setup significantly.
performing at De Groene Gemeenschap, Amsterdam – October 2013
(video by Jan/De Groene Gemeenschap)
(video by Jan/De Groene Gemeenschap)
Currently, two sound generator systems, one based on FM-synthesis and the other one on
granular-synthesis, are included. An output stage common to all
sound sources provides reverberation and gain fx processing.
A delay unit – I call it delaybox – provides stomp-box-like time delay effects.
A special ring buffer constantly records the audio from a dedicated ringbuffer
bus. All synthesiser voices' outputs are collected
on the main bus which feeds the output stage. The delaybox and main out signals
are passed on to the ringbuffer bus. The ring buffer's output in turn feeds the
main bus. This allows to treat the ring buffer signal similar to a
synthesiser voice. A dedicated replay function
reads the ring buffer when triggered by the performer.
clusters of superimposing rhythms created by just employing the scivolo's sound synthesis engine
I decided not to try to get every possible parameter onto the musical interface.
It is a genuine challenge to have as few parameters as possible accessible while
retaining great flexibility.
Since the amount of available controls on the nanoKONTROL2 is limited I had to
introduce a set of mode-buttons which allow the performer to switch between different
layers of controls. Currently there are separate layers for the FM-synthesiser and
the granular-synthesis engine. A third layer is reserved for future use.
Preset management, mode selection,
reverberation unit, delaybox, gain fx, ring buffer, output volume and a note-on indicator
are accessible from all virtual layers (this is for the current scivolo version 0.9).



